<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SEC Regulation of Leveraged Short ETFs Coming?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://etffundinvesting.com/inverse-etfs/sec-regulation-of-leveraged-short-etfs-coming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://etffundinvesting.com/inverse-etfs/sec-regulation-of-leveraged-short-etfs-coming/</link>
	<description>News and Tools for Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 00:28:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Whatever</title>
		<link>http://etffundinvesting.com/inverse-etfs/sec-regulation-of-leveraged-short-etfs-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Whatever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 18:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etffundinvesting.com/inverse-etfs/sec-regulation-of-leveraged-short-etfs-coming/#comment-24</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s because of two things: volatility and momentum. 

A high volatility has a depressing effect on both short and long leveraged ETF&#039;s. This can be massive if volatility is very high. Likewise a relatively low volatility raises both short and long leveraged ETF&#039;s. I believe the point at which the net effect is about zero for the S&amp;P 500 is when its volatility index is about 20 (don&#039;t know about other indexes). 
(http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=^vix) 

About momentum: apparently if a (short or long) leveraged ETF is making profit (its stock price is going up), the leverage is increased and vice versa. 

Thus: best case scenario for (short and long) leveraged ETF&#039;s: a steady increase of its price under low volatility. Worst case scenario: a non-directional market with high volatility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s because of two things: volatility and momentum. </p>
<p>A high volatility has a depressing effect on both short and long leveraged ETF&#8217;s. This can be massive if volatility is very high. Likewise a relatively low volatility raises both short and long leveraged ETF&#8217;s. I believe the point at which the net effect is about zero for the S&amp;P 500 is when its volatility index is about 20 (don&#8217;t know about other indexes).<br />
(<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=" rel="nofollow">http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=</a>^vix) </p>
<p>About momentum: apparently if a (short or long) leveraged ETF is making profit (its stock price is going up), the leverage is increased and vice versa. </p>
<p>Thus: best case scenario for (short and long) leveraged ETF&#8217;s: a steady increase of its price under low volatility. Worst case scenario: a non-directional market with high volatility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FLAMAN</title>
		<link>http://etffundinvesting.com/inverse-etfs/sec-regulation-of-leveraged-short-etfs-coming/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>FLAMAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 17:44:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etffundinvesting.com/inverse-etfs/sec-regulation-of-leveraged-short-etfs-coming/#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Would someone please explain, in simple English, why the leveraged ETFs under perform over longer periods of time. If they are constructed to &quot;match&quot; the ups and downs of their stocks, why does this price match happen?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would someone please explain, in simple English, why the leveraged ETFs under perform over longer periods of time. If they are constructed to &#8220;match&#8221; the ups and downs of their stocks, why does this price match happen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
